Difference between revisions of "Talk:En US TrainingGrounds"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
----------- | ----------- | ||
I don't want opinions. I want facts. I don't care about the debate here, only in the job of transcribing facts about the game itself. If someone wants to debate the ability of a king in this historical period to enter any building in his kingdom, that is fine. But it does nothing to alter the wiki until it is in the code. I am just interested in what the code allows on this one. | I don't want opinions. I want facts. I don't care about the debate here, only in the job of transcribing facts about the game itself. If someone wants to debate the ability of a king in this historical period to enter any building in his kingdom, that is fine. But it does nothing to alter the wiki until it is in the code. I am just interested in what the code allows on this one. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | New Question: Is the Wooden Dummy used in anyway when a session is cancelled? |
Revision as of 13:39, 25 June 2011
Does the King and/or Vassal and/or anyone else have access to the private menu to the training ground. Or the Acacemy for that matter. Or all public buildings in a city?
I will use the same language as the Academy for this structure's descriptions. I suggest the term Gymnasium for Weights. Unless you have a progession of titles already thought out. It is more romantic. Which is ironically real and really ironic.
Please use the forum section http://forum.medieval-europe.eu/index.php/board,181.0.html for ask this, so all players can give their opinion.
I don't want opinions. I want facts. I don't care about the debate here, only in the job of transcribing facts about the game itself. If someone wants to debate the ability of a king in this historical period to enter any building in his kingdom, that is fine. But it does nothing to alter the wiki until it is in the code. I am just interested in what the code allows on this one.
New Question: Is the Wooden Dummy used in anyway when a session is cancelled?